From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,88cb7446cf44556a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!koehntopp.de!news.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reliability and deadlock in Annex E/distributed code (progress at last!) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:41:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4nptj6Fb8sbqU1@individual.net> References: <87psdnfqel.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: individual.net qzDO5L5RmRyiPRYxsHRqAwmA6Jm2dSdOZiuIH9mHYKrkAKec4= User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6719 Date: 2006-09-25T13:41:46+02:00 List-Id: Dr. Adrian Wrigley wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:17:51 +0000, Bj�rn Persson wrote: > >> Dr. Adrian Wrigley wrote: >>> So I have managed to make the code run absolutely reliably. >> >> Congratulations! You deserve some success after all the trouble you've >> had. > > Thank you. > > I feel like Annex E Ada is a niche within a niche in programming. > That puts me in a tiny minority, even of readers at c.l.a > Moving to 64-bit with GtkAda puts me in another minority. > > I hope the relatively sparse responses to the thread on this > topic just reflect that these are minority Ada topics, and not > a reaction against someone with unreasonable demands or behaviour! I'm sure many people are interested in your findings. As you say, it seems you're in a niche within a niche so for now you're a bit lonely there...