From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,489591d353106d0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: Code compatibility of GNAT on Win/NT with other compilers Date: 1996/05/17 Message-ID: <4ngkvj$837@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 155220231 references: <9605162131.AA14304@eight-ball> organization: Comp Sci, University of Melbourne newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bob Crispen writes: >As yet another Unix guy, I find the gnu tools very easy to work with >and reasonably mature. In fact, I don't even have c:\Windows\Command >in my $PATH. The GNU tools in gnu-win32 are great, but I wouldn't call them mature. There is a reason why all the releases of gnu-win32 so far have been called "beta" releases, and that reason is that they are still quite buggy. For example, in the latest release, beta-14, some very basic things such as `gcc hello.c' don't work on Windows 95 (or at least they don't work for me). -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.