From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3fa706d5ad40e71c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: blaak@mda.ca (Ray Blaak)
Subject: Re: Help with Exceptions! (fwd)
Date: 1996/05/08
Message-ID: <4mqhj3$sp7@map.mda.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 153753721
references: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960508012641.2120A-100000@pentagon.io.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Macdonald Dettwiler & Associates
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Actually, the gotos and extra returns are unnecessary, for the natural control
flow will accomplish the same thing:

procedure test is
  x:integer;
begin
  begin
    x := 10000000;
  exception
    when Constraint_Error => null;
  end;
  begin
    x := 3;
  exception
    when Constraint_Error => null;
  end;
end test;

Dave <davedave@io.com> writes:
>procedure test is
>        x:integer ;
>begin
>	begin
>	        x := 10000000 ;
>        exception
>		when CONSTRAINT_ERROR =>
>			goto Next_Block ;
>	end ;
><<Next_Block>>
>	begin
>		x := 3 ;
>        exception
>		when CONSTRAINT_ERROR =>
>			RETURN ;
>	end ;
>	RETURN ;
>end test;


Cheers,
Ray Blaak
blaak@mda.ca