From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,411186037d1bc912
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: Some questions about Ada.
Date: 1996/05/06
Message-ID: <4mljpe$sau@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 153329833
distribution: world
references: <DqrD2C.Jyr@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
 <dewar.831213757@schonberg> <Dqvx6E.IIo@world.std.com>
 <dewar.831268468@schonberg> <DqxKEz.Cs0@world.std.com>
 <evans-0505961547050001@ppp2.pgh.net> <dewar.831333441@schonberg>
organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.831333441@schonberg>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: 

|> This is fixed in 3.05, and we now get
|>
|>      1.     seperate (FOO)
|>             |
|>         >>> Incorrect spelling of keyword "separate"

Very nice, but at least as of 3.03, you did not issue a warning about a
controlled type with a primitive operation named Initialise.   ;-)

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com