From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,411186037d1bc912
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: Some questions about Ada.
Date: 1996/05/05
Message-ID: <4mi2fh$sae@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 153111845
references: <dewar.831213757@schonberg> <4mfl9c$1p8@news.nyu.edu>
 <dewar.831218670@schonberg>
organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.831218670@schonberg> dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>I know this viewpoint, but I don't agree. It is still very much subject
>to the problems of talking about the program verbally.

Not necessarily. The existance of the convention allows you to
"pronounce" the case difference by using the meaning of the
capitalization in the convention.

So you have "type wire" vs "struct wire" or "public make_wire" vs
"private make_wire" or "macro alloc" vs "function alloc".