From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public
From: jmccarty@sun1307.spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty)
Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
Date: 1996/04/22
Message-ID: <4lgube$dla@sun001.spd.dsccc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 150866139
references: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <dewar.828757752@schonberg>
 <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <dewar.829345812@schonberg>
organization: DSC Communications Corporation
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
Date: 1996-04-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <dewar.829345812@schonberg>, Robert Dewar <dewar@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
)Chuck said
)
)"With the same proviso, all of them.  Of the many POSIX standards, only
)POSIX.1-1990 and POSIX.2-1992 have usable validation test suites."
)
)Fair enough, but I meant national or international standards when I asked
)my question.
)
)By the way, which Unices are 100% posix threads compliant (you ssaid you
)knew).

Presumably, all of them. Note that the standard does -not- require
things to be implemented, for an implementation to be compliant. And
threads are part of the "optional" portion of Posix.

Mike
-- 
----
char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}

I don't speak for DSC.         <- They make me say that.