From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,14e13e6d99ef0a58,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: amd@kuwait.net (Ahmed A-Olaimi) Subject: Task as a parameter! Date: 1996/04/18 Message-ID: <4l52dg$7qh@gulfa.kuwait.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 148152645 organization: Private newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Under Ada95 paradigm ... Is it possible to pass a Task as a prammerter ? Can you imagin the impact on such scheme on distriputed systems? better than that, imagin having an object class of Task and the task alocator is a dynamic process that will detect the existance of a new machice (potenctial procession node) to be binded on the fly and the Task alocator will pass task object to it !!! hmmm a mouth watering "PARADIGM" !!!!! tell me what do you think ;) -- amd@kuwait.net 1. Parallaling idealogies 2. Indexing life 3. Paradigming 4. Objective Knowledge Discovery "can we live without them?"