From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Chuck Karish) Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX Date: 1996/04/17 Message-ID: <4l3jns$kt2@nntp.Stanford.EDU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 148055770 references: <4l0k0q$lll@nntp.Stanford.EDU> organization: Mindcraft, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu Date: 1996-04-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , David Emery wrote: >The U.S. DoD has paid for a substantial amount of participation within >the POSIX community, and by no means limited to Ada bindings! Of course. I was far too flip in my previous article. The problem remains that the IEEE Standards Board depends on document sales for a significant portion of its income. I would love to see IEEE standards distributed in electronic form. That would save me a lot of typing. As long as the standards process needs a paid support staff someone will have to pay their them. Any suggestions? -- Chuck Karish karish@mindcraft.com (415) 323-9000 x117 karish@pangea.stanford.edu