From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public From: karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Chuck Karish) Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX Date: 1996/04/15 Message-ID: <4kuc6p$3bt@nntp.Stanford.EDU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 147662784 references: <4knr5l$gb1@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <4x4tqo2b1d.fsf_-_@bernoulli.enst-bretagne.fr> organization: Mindcraft, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu Date: 1996-04-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <4x4tqo2b1d.fsf_-_@bernoulli.enst-bretagne.fr>, Laurent Guerby wrote: > > Is there something new about POSIX standards ? Are they now freely >or cheaply available somewhere ? You still have to buy them from the IEEE. They are reluctant to give them away because document sales pay for a significant portion of IEEE's support for standards. -- Chuck Karish karish@mindcraft.com (415) 323-9000 x117 karish@pangea.stanford.edu