From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku)
Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
Date: 1996/04/12
Message-ID: <4kmeo8INN4gd@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 147210876
references: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
 <4kkru5INN71j@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <4km8el$3he@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
Date: 1996-04-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4km8el$3he@nntp.Stanford.EDU>,
Chuck Karish <karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
>Neither POSIX.1-1990 nor FIPS 151-2 requires that a conforming
>system support the POSIX.1 general terminal interface.  Windows
>NT 3.51 does not do so.

Right. And the ANSI/ISO C standard doesn't require that a program that has more
than one instance of an object that is 32K long be translated by a conforming
implementation.
--