From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public From: karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Chuck Karish) Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada) Date: 1996/04/12 Message-ID: <4km8el$3he@nntp.Stanford.EDU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 147170998 references: <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <4kkru5INN71j@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> organization: Mindcraft, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu Date: 1996-04-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <4kkru5INN71j@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>, Kazimir Kylheku wrote: >In article <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU>, >Chuck Karish wrote: >>Incorrect premise: Windows NT does conform to POSIX.1 and the >>US Government does buy it as a FIPS 151-2 conforming system. > >It does? You mean under NT, I could, say, disable the console echo by making >suitable changes to a ``struct termios'', and pass it to tcsetattr()? >Or send a SIGTSTP signal to the foreground process group from the controlling >terminal? Wow... Neither POSIX.1-1990 nor FIPS 151-2 requires that a conforming system support the POSIX.1 general terminal interface. Windows NT 3.51 does not do so. -- Chuck Karish karish@mindcraft.com (415) 323-9000 x117 karish@pangea.stanford.edu