From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1bad2c41a59ed9b8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: morphis@fnalv1.fnal.gov
Subject: GNAT, OS/2, Libraries
Date: 1996/04/10
Message-ID: <4kgf38$qaa@fnnews.fnal.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 146731939
organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
reply-to: morphis@fnalv1.fnal.gov
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

    Hi,
    	I occasionally lurk here and one of the comments I have read
    about GNAT in general and GNAT for OS/2 in particular is that there
    is a lack of libraries.  Excuse my ignorance but what does that mean?
    	Are we talking about something basic to the language? or about 
    libraries of routines that will find the roots of Bessel functions,
    draw squares or create x-widgets?
        While these last are presumably of importance getting wide
    acceptance, for me personally (not being a professional programmer
    or anything close) their lack is something I can easily live with.
    	Thanks for any light you can shed on this.
    Robert 
    Morphis@physics.niu.edu