From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku) Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada) Date: 1996/04/09 Message-ID: <4kf8k1INN68b@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 146688344 references: <829066525snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu Date: 1996-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert Dewar wrote: >Linux simply checks that the end of the buffer is in the memory area, >which is not the check you would like to see. That's what I was talking >about when I noted that this kind of uncertainty would not occur in >a language with a reasonably complete type model. Precisely. The kernel defends itself against making a faulty dereference that would trigger an exception, but will happily corrupt your valid data, unless stated buffer range sticks over into an unmapped page. >What exactly *is* the wording of the POSIX standard here (Lawrence, you >must have it at hand, please quote it exactly). The interesting thing >is to determine whether this definition says enough to make *any* use >of read defined without appealing to "unwritten rules". I would guess >not! Unwritten rules, or paranoia. Take your pick! (Door #2 for me, please) The standard is basically very good at telling you what the functions do. BTW, I checked the Ada POSIX standard too, but that reads like a VCR manual from 1984. ;) heh --