From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ea02452876a15e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,c52c30d32b866eae X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,c52c30d32b866eae X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) Subject: Re: Real OO Date: 1996/04/09 Message-ID: <4ke7ri$iiv@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 146576445 distribution: world references: <4j9p3a$uo5@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <4kbqun$iiv@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object Date: 1996-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes: |> Norm, you didn't mention (e), something is done at link time. I had intended |> >(a) It is impossible to write a routine that has such expectations. |> > [If so, Eiffel is less flexible than Ada.] to include any pre-execution-time prohibition, whether by a compile-time or a link-time check. -- Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com