From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,f92fbb4a0420dd57 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f92fbb4a0420dd57 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: geert@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl (Geert Bosch) Subject: Re: some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user Date: 1996/04/03 Message-ID: <4jsesm$gpa@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 145584339 references: <315D902C.6F7B@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <4jmuj5$lkh@dayuc.dayton.saic.com> <315F4A9D.7E6F@mcs.com> <4jq4vd$2s5@ferrari.NetXpress.com> followup-to: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ organization: La Calandre Infortunee newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1996-04-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Glenn H. Porter (ghporter@NetXpress.com) wrote: `` Most folks that responded to this missed something. That it is simply easier to parse source code that has all of the declarations in one section while building a symbol table. '' You still forgot to mention something: Also for humans (at least for this human) it is simply easier to parse source code that has all of the declarations in one section. Regards, Geert PS. I'm afraid I also build symbol tables while parsing the source ;-)