From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e8251cd11c860d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dweller@dfw.net (David Weller)
Subject: Re: Renaming record discriminants.
Date: 1996/04/01
Message-ID: <4jpmh2$111@dfw.dfw.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 145420017
references: <Dp75Aq.B1o@ssd.ray.com> <Dp7Eoo.FLK.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <Dp7Eoo.FLK.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@henning.camb.inmet.com> wrote:
>
>If it really complains, then this is a compiler bug.
>...
>You can rename a discriminant.  Either the compiler has a bug, or 
>...
>It sounds like a compiler bug, 
>

What's your point, Tucker?



:-)


I know: Go away, I'm bugging you :-)

-- 
Ancient man: Web apps? Java!  OO stuff? Eiffel!  "Real-time" stuff? C/C++! 
Modern man: Web apps? Ada 95!  OO stuff? Ada 95!  "Real-time" stuff? Ada 95!
	Not a revolution...but evolution.  http://lglwww.epfl.ch/Ada