From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f0734f2e7653d35 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: griest-tom@cs.yale.edu (Tom Griest) Subject: Re: GNAT's gnatchp Date: 1996/03/31 Message-ID: <4jmnplINN4mm@RA.DEPT.CS.YALE.EDU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 145112523 references: <4jieuo$oao@portal.gmu.edu> organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept., New Haven, CT 06520-2158 cc: pierce@patriot.net newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-03-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Peter J. Pierce writes: >I have been trying to get the GNAT utility "gnatchp" to work >without success. > >I have strictly followed the documentation >in the help file gcc.hlp which was distributed with >version 3.01 for Windows95/NT. I have tried it both with >version 3.01 for Windows95/NT and with version 3.03 on a SUN. Well, I can't speak for the Sun version, but on Win32 platforms you want to use "gnatchop" not "gnatchp". This is especially confusing since there is a gnatchp.exe program that is invoked by gnatchop.bat. I think in future versions, it might be a good idea to give gnatchp a different name so that this type of error doesn't happen. I'll submit a comment to the list that is involved in maintaining gnat, since we would have to coordinate all the ports to change at the same time. -Tom