From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e60fe41dcabc5f5d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2
Date: 1996/03/29
Message-ID: <4jhqq0$gov@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 144974901
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960329151135.29135A-100000@solar.sky.net>
organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.960329151135.29135A-100000@solar.sky.net> John Howard <jhoward@solar.sky.net> writes:
>To me, the hitch has always been finding and getting the GNAT copyright 
>holder to sign the release waiver and statement of ownership which IBM 
>requires.

Why isn't the GPL sufficient for this?  What, precisely, does IBM want
signed?  Do you have a copy?

>Any ideas on which individual with FSF officially signs the forms?

Richard Stallman: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu