From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9f9e2fe839e16e70,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: okellogg@cube.net (Oliver Kellogg)
Subject: GNAT.OS_Lib a portable OS interface?
Date: 1996/03/27
Message-ID: <4ja1pj$vp4@salyko.cube.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 144396738
content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
organization: CUBENet Multiline BBS
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Tired of reinventing Yet Another "portable" OS interface, this:

Is the package GNAT.OS_Lib intended to be just that?
In particular, will this package be implemented for VMS (once the
GNAT port to VMS is there)? If not, are there other recommended ways
of interfacing to commonly found operating system services.

Oliver