From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9c3a99d47a847ea4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: WhiteR@CRPL.Cedar-Rapids.lib.IA.US (Robert S. White)
Subject: Re: Air Force abandoning Ada - NOT!
Date: 1996/03/24
Message-ID: <4j2a7q$ooq@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143962235
distribution: world
references: <31482EB2.744@lfwc.lockheed.com>
 <4iuuml$27r@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
content-type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
organization: self
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4iuuml$27r@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, blissful@aol.com says...
>
>the B-1B processors and to convert our current mish mash
>of JOVIAL/AP-101F avionics software to Ada?
>
  Speaking from the experience of converting from Jovial (C like) to Ada 83 
for GPS now GPS/INS embedded system developement, I think you will be able to 
look back after a few years of work on a team programming effort and think 
the change was worthwhile.  Ada 95 will only be better. IMHO and AFAIK.
-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
Robert S. White                    -- an embedded systems software engineer
WhiteR@CRPL.Cedar-Rapids.lib.IA.US -- It's long, but I pay for it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------