From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ea02452876a15e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: Real OO
Date: 1996/03/21
Message-ID: <4isf7r$1dn6@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143483393
distribution: world
references: <4id031$cf9@dayuc.dayton.saic.com>
 <314f6cf8.682571966@news.dimensional.com>
 <Pine.NXT.3.91.960319235945.4281A-100000-100000@pentad>
 <4ip7eb$66v@dayuc.dayton.saic.com> <leschkes.827424395@ferret>
organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <leschkes.827424395@ferret>, leschkes@ferret.cig.mot.com
(Scott Leschke) writes: 

|> How does one declare syntactically that an operation is SPECIFIC to a
|> type within a class, as opposed to being either a primitive of that
|> type or class-wide?

One way is to declare the operation in a different package (either a
physically nested package or a child package or an unrelated library
package).

Well, maybe that's three ways.

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com