From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,16e3a8dd4f3ab3f3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: l117593@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Cordes MJ) Subject: Re: Elaboration order Date: 1996/03/20 Message-ID: <4inpiv$alk@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 143318222 distribution: world references: <314701A1.469D@lfwc.lockheed.com> <31494143.3825@lfwc.lockheed.com> <4icbnc$cda@wdl1.wdl.loral.com> <314D2E1C.5C72@lfwc.lockheed.com> <4in4am$klb@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-03-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: As an aside to the RM discussion of this thread, how do I know that Ada compiler X will generate the correct (as defined in the RM) elaboration order? I know that ACVC tests do not guarantee correct code generation. Is the ACVC suite more complete when it comes to elaboration? Is there a standard benchmark used by compiler vendors? Or, for safety critical functions, should I verify this for every application build? Thanks in advance. Mike -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael J Cordes Phone: (817) 935-3823 Fax: (817) 935-3800 EMail: CordesMJ@lfwc.lockheed.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------