From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,94e5dd5646e21259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Interfacing to C: multithreaded callbacks
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <1181678190.757347.67290@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <m8lrp9shht63$.w8hlpj4jf0ve$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1181748188.465208.3770@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4im4a379jh6r$.1k2xm6hilg50t$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jun 2007 17:55:19 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: a6471d88.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=XYYSfP[`HKfUoRk[hk2WalA9EHlD;3Ycb4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkGmd]gZQccXf[6LHn;2LCVn[<mhadbfdUkGFJ1V[Q3<dm17Sb9dF;V4e
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16180
Date: 2007-06-13T17:55:19+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:23:08 -0700, Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> On 13 Cze, 10:11, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> However, when talking about  POSIX targets, I would assume Ada tasks being
>> POSIX threads.
> 
> Yes, that should be obvious implementation strategy. It doesn't
> automagically solve all problems, though. The threads started by C
> library will be "pure virgin threads", without any Ada-related context
> information that might be stored in TLS (Thread Local Storage), for
> example.

At least it will give you a chance to use POSIX synchronization objects
when talking with Ada tasks.

Just take an Ada OS instead, with POSIX stuff implemented on the top of Ada
RTL. (:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de