From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada Date: 1996/03/18 Message-ID: <4ik5ip$cl6@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 143087501 distribution: world references: <00001a73+00002504@msn.com> <3146E324.5C1E@lfwc.lockheed.com> <4i98gg$8n1@solutions.solon.com> <4ia41k$e04@solutions.solon.com> organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1996-03-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <4ia41k$e04@solutions.solon.com>, seebs@solutions.solon.com (Peter Seebach) writes: |> My general strategy is to just rebuild everything after any significant |> change. CPU time is cheap during the build process. I have more processor |> time than hair. Ada would reject this comparison as a type mismatch. C apparently silently promotes both processor time and hair to unsigned long. ;-) -- Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com