From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,751584f55705ddb7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ucaa2385@alpha1.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de (Peter Hermann) Subject: Re: Ada is almost useless in embedded systems Date: 1996/03/18 Message-ID: <4ijnj7$lrm@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 143040806 distribution: world references: <9603131418.AA01642@eight-ball> <4ichi8$17tg@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-03-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Norman H. Cohen (ncohen@watson.ibm.com) wrote: : And for bases 37 and higher, from what alphabet do you choose the digits : for 36, 37, 38, ...? : Let's face it, based literals were placed in Ada to provide a clear : correspondence with bit patterns and with specifications expressed in : binary, octal, or hex. Has anybody out there ever found a genuine : application for literals in any of the bases 3 .. 7 | 9 | 11 .. 15? it's nice to have this, e.g. for education or various math situations, practical "exact" input of numbers with properties of a certain base, etc. (e.g. input of 1/3 , 1/7, etc.) Ada200x possibly going up to 36 could be useful for encoding numerical material into non-critical (i.e. no control chars) ascii-sequences while saving space, formed by a-z+0-9 -- Peter Hermann Tel:+49-711-685-3611 Fax:3758 ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de Pfaffenwaldring 27, 70569 Stuttgart Uni Computeranwendungen Team Ada: "C'mon people let the world begin" (Paul McCartney)