From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,45d937e5cf2567
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: entries and access parameters
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:53:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4hnfhcFegpdU1@individual.net>
References: <4hn8k3FdjobU1@individual.net>
 <44b683f3$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net 5MxozKdI9aqy2yTJgRQdiwFkW7PUZettTMQHK/BVlX+a5J6bs=
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5666
Date: 2006-07-13T19:53:59+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stuart wrote:

> "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:4hn8k3FdjobU1@individual.net...
>> I'm trying to find in the 95 rationale the explanation for this point
>>
>> http://www.adahome.com/rm95/rm9x-09-05-02.html
>>
>> (13) An entry_declaration in a task declaration shall not contain a
>> specification for an access parameter (See 3.10)
>> I'm curious about that prohibition, mainly to know if workarounding it
>> with
>> a type like
> 
> I can't help with the reference to 3.10, but the annotated ARM gives the
> following after 9.5.2 (13)

Ahhh thanks, so it was there where I read about it. Now it's coming back.

(removed the relevant part of the aarm).