From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.illinois.net!attcg1!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Followup-To: comp.lang.ada Date: 10 Mar 2005 20:52:59 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <4hIVAmTjB5Hj@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <42309456$1@news.broadpark.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1110509504 2374 192.135.80.34 (11 Mar 2005 02:51:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9082 Date: 2005-03-10T20:52:59-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Paul E. Bennett" writes: > Now, I know a lot of people who do use C, C++, Ada and Java in mission > critical systems and do so successfully. Most of them use some form of > checking tools (even the Ada guys). It is certainly a long way from the "if > it compiles it is right" attitude that has seemed to have been purported by > just a very few of the Ada crowd here. If I understand where the various posters are coming from, there have not been any Ada users saying "if it compiles it is right", but rather "if it fails to compile, it is wrong" and "Ada will fail to compile on a larger number of errors than many other languages".