From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: C/C++ ... out of Ada
Date: 1996/02/22
Message-ID: <4ghv7r$10f5@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140651401
distribution: world
references: <00001a73+00002504@msn.com> <4etcmm$lpd@nova.dimensional.com>
organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4ggt07$7mm@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>, ok@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU
(Richard A. O'Keefe) writes: 

|> PL/I-style "record" I/O is also not supported by Ada 95.

Sequential_IO provides the basic capabilities of PL/I record I/O,
although it is obviously not a clone of that facility.

|> It might actually be worth discussing this at some time; what did DEC Ada
|> do about RMS?

DEC adopted a gcc-based Ada compiler for the Alpha.

(I presume that by RMS you mean Richard M. Stallman. ;-) )

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com