From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,120a40ece2c29ff2,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dweller@dfw.net (David Weller) Subject: PVM, MPI, Ada? Date: 1996/02/20 Message-ID: <4gdbvk$81o@dfw.dfw.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 140396348 organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-02-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I recall reading somewhere a while ago that there was going to be a PVM binding available for Ada. This looked like a good idea, but it seems that MPI is moving into PVM's spot as "Parallel Architecture du Jour". Does anybody know if there is an MPI binding for Ada? Does anybody else think both those standards are somewhat redundant with Ada 95's annexes? Does anybody care? :-) -- GNAT = GNAT is Not an Ada Translator ==Ada 95 Booch Components: www.ocsystems.com/booch or www.dfw.net/~dweller== Reality: Work, Work, Work, Guitar. | Plugged: Fender Telecaster Deluxe Fantasy: Guitar, Guitar, Guitar, Work(ha!) | Unplugged: Yamaha CG-150SA