From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8649fff061f58a88
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ray Toal <rtoal@eecs.lmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Gnat301A on Win95--no EXE's produced.
Date: 1996/02/19
Message-ID: <4g99v3$pgo@ux1.lmu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140043768
references: <31280DB7.76A9@his.com>
to: tdaniels@his.com
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Loyola Marymount University
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (Windows; U; 16bit)
Date: 1996-02-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Tom Daniels <tdaniels@his.com> wrote:

>I do the following:
>gcc -c simple.adb
>gnatbind -o hello.exe hello.ali
>(I think that gnatbind is the command)

Actually it is gnatbl
               ^^^^^^

Actually you can save yourself some trouble and just type

  gnatmake simple

which compiles, binds and builds.  I've only found compiling and 
linking separately to be useful in two cases:

  1.  Just doing simple checking with gcc -gnatc

  2.  Mixed language programming

Check out gnatinfo.txt which came with your compiler, or the on-line
help file gcc.hlp since you have Win32.

>And....
>I get no error messages or problems, but
>no hello.exe either!
>Surely someone else is having this problem too.