From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b4301b0685c8a4c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: nabbasi@qualcomm.com (Nasser Abbasi)
Subject: Re: Do you C my Ada? (or why C++ knocks the crap out of Ada rehashed)
Date: 1996/02/19
Message-ID: <4g9849$j85@qualcomm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140038472
references: <00001a73+000027fe@msn.com>
organization: QUalcomm Inc.
reply-to: x!news.be.innet.net!INbe.net!usenet
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <00001a73+000027fe@msn.com>, KMays@msn.com (Kenneth Mays) says:
>

>Ponder this: Why was there a problem with the Boeing 777 
>avionics/flight software that was written in Ada? There are a few 
>articles on this subject. 

My limited readings on the Ada/Boeing 777 project is that using Ada
was considered a good choice and a success for that project. 

So, what problem do you refer to? just curiuos...

thanks.
Nasser