From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,23dabf88feae3dba X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Elaboration worries Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:36:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4fva3aF1lff5cU1@individual.net> References: <4fssh9F1ena5jU1@individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net T8SA/PWPj1mw7lwLP7yYbgHuLAxfgSActohHlXjSDQPaerB8k= User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4899 Date: 2006-06-22T12:36:54+02:00 List-Id: Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > Hello, > > I'm revisiting this topic in hope of enlightenment by someone that really > understand the dark magic behind elaboration. I've read the relevant > sections of the ARM but I can just grasp a more-or-less depth > understanding, of which details fade away with time. Many thanks for all the clarifications and comments, they're really useful to me and will be of great aid when reading the RM again. I'm also interested in the "cheating" for I/O, since this seems really a weak spot. Any other cheats besides the one mentioned by Mr.Duff?