From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b78c363353551702 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.228.227 with SMTP id sl3mr12283292pbc.5.1341557600863; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni11017pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!usenet-fr.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:53:34 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: about the new Ada 2012 pre/post conditions References: <1hgo6aks03zy.by4pq4xbjsgf$.dlg@40tude.net> <1jvy3elqtnd1j.1sjbk32evhp1f$.dlg@40tude.net> <1oih2rok18dmt.avbwrres5k12.dlg@40tude.net> <13hfxjlq0xqtq.x3v8evyf4pku$.dlg@40tude.net> <13p2n1ve6lbrc.yr8d2a5ljm8$.dlg@40tude.net> <4ff58367$0$6643$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <10ktgm7jrm9dw.1bbb23g5d4pet.dlg@40tude.net> <4ff5da0a$0$6637$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4ff68b60$0$9526$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Jul 2012 08:53:20 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 77a6890c.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=\Em^_YVmNL2d8Nb@@ZG@b=ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1nkgeX?EC@@0f=EcIUW:@h2PCY\c7>ejV89O]nZ9K^f@2:OG4cQ55hl7 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-07-06T08:53:20+02:00 List-Id: On 05.07.12 21:57, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:16:42 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > >> On 05.07.12 14:31, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>>> too far reaching >>>>> assumptions, from which, I think, no one suggests your logic does not >>>>> follow. >>> Can you point these assumptions out? >>> >> >> moment, please ... > > (infinite recursion into self-referential propositions (:-)) Working against what appears to be from an rhetoric arsenal, even when only accidentally, and collecting all references correctlyisn't that easy.