From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b78c363353551702
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.228.227 with SMTP id sl3mr13089604pbc.5.1340628690444;
        Mon, 25 Jun 2012 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni18210pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:51:28 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: about the new Ada 2012 pre/post conditions
References: <jrsjr7$uuo$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1hgo6aks03zy.by4pq4xbjsgf$.dlg@40tude.net> <jrsmfh$6fq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <npdjip6ohqlt$.1x6bxc9jsaago$.dlg@40tude.net> <js00co$clj$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1jvy3elqtnd1j.1sjbk32evhp1f$.dlg@40tude.net> <js2hq5$9fj$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1oih2rok18dmt.avbwrres5k12.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fe59ea0$0$9502$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1mkp7fzlk1b0y.1ueinfjn48fcy$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fe72b6b$0$9504$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1bbvp3ghpjb5s.1go1s1qvcmagh$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fe76fad$0$9507$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1jt8vhzxfrv2i.eohce4d3rwx1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fe83aaa$0$6624$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <1pkfv0tiod3rn$.onx6dmaa3if9$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fe85beb$0$6638$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <4fe85beb$0$6638$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Message-ID: <4fe85ed0$0$6628$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 2012 14:51:29 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 262811d7.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=bGEJfQW5RjL6PJ?[X6JIXEA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOK\M8Q7Z_Bh2Mnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jM3Y7fo7mK;2@
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-06-25T14:51:29+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 25.06.12 14:39, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>> > But you seemingly did not read what I wrote earlier. There is either #1 or
>> > #2.
> I have tried to explain that neither #1 nor #2 are applicable
> because they assume applicability of exhaustive formal analysis
> to general program design (not programs). Wrong frame of reference.

Let me ad this:

  procedure P (X : S) is null;

is o.K., but

  procedure P (X : S'Base)
    with  Pre => ...
  is null;

is not legal.