From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b78c363353551702
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr3282884pbc.4.1340368803337;
        Fri, 22 Jun 2012 05:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni6850pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:39:25 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: about the new Ada 2012 pre/post conditions
References: <jrsjr7$uuo$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1hgo6aks03zy.by4pq4xbjsgf$.dlg@40tude.net> <jrsmfh$6fq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <npdjip6ohqlt$.1x6bxc9jsaago$.dlg@40tude.net> <js00co$clj$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1jvy3elqtnd1j.1sjbk32evhp1f$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fe45ce8$0$9508$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <4fe45ce8$0$9508$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Message-ID: <4fe4677e$0$9507$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jun 2012 14:39:26 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9b8a0242.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=R=`JPC[m96XmG86`U=_nC_ic==]BZ:af^4Fo<]lROoRQnkgeX?EC@@P[A^MO;>XjJWnc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]Nj[g]O;[cYP
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-06-22T14:39:26+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 22.06.12 13:54, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> (I have indicated alternative possibilities (just on Pop),
> as the specific contract of this example is probably one
 s/probably/certainly/