From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,51bff7cd4c35a15d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr9715179pbc.0.1338303802901;
        Tue, 29 May 2012 08:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni62616pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news2.euro.net!novso.com!nerim.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:02:47 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada2012 : In praise of 'for ... of ... loop'...
References: <74e4e6b5-20bd-4388-b4a0-dfbecc8070be@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <74e4e6b5-20bd-4388-b4a0-dfbecc8070be@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <4fc4e51d$0$6566$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 May 2012 17:02:53 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 1811515d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=0gLNI:PRL6Ik:C4l9A;OcO4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKFOi;j7TObNBnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jMA]4SfHo8A=I
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
X-Received-Bytes: 1532
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-05-29T17:02:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 29.05.12 16:29, Martin wrote:
> This addition to Ada is brilliant...I've just been refactoring some Ada05 into Ada2012 and this just makes the code so much clearer! No more nested subprograms (of nested subprograms (of nested ...)).
> 
> -- Martin

Could you illustrate a bit? How much of the clarity is caused, if
so, by being shorter, using assignment in place of nested subprograms,
reducing the number of names, or ...