From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,25457a5aee9eaa04
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.241.98 with SMTP id wh2mr8977311pbc.7.1338284288305;
        Tue, 29 May 2012 02:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni61776pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 11:38:02 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2
References: 
 <1962744539359908272.324914rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
 <c0e6f1d9fbc3ef0c750a01bb8e2133b4@dizum.com>
 <87k3zwp0xw.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <op.we1sofwrule2fv@douda-yannick>
In-Reply-To: <op.we1sofwrule2fv@douda-yannick>
Message-ID: <4fc498ff$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 May 2012 11:38:07 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: d5a18fbc.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=<OY<bmRjR>f>jlK2>IgHGd4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk0cGjm6MEWafnc\616M64>jLh>_cHTX3jmf8E7UO7:iEg
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-05-29T11:38:07+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 29.05.12 04:18, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote:
> Le Mon, 28 May 2012 21:20:27 +0200, Ludovic Brenta
> <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> a écrit:
>> Stallman's only "nefarious purpose" is to prevent people from removing
>> freedom from free software.
> No. It was to force people to a its license, thus denying one's freedom to
> apply on it's own work.

It is stunning to see programmers who are used to formal,
rational thinking, becoming irrational. ;-) ;-)

The *combination* of someone else's work and yours is not your own
work! The resulting work is *not* the sole intellectual property
of either contributor.  You may have the right, though, to do
business with the resulting work without consulting this some
else, if his/her license says so. (E.g., one does not have
intellectual rights in Microsoft's runtime components even
though their license text says that one may distribute them
with an application.)

Respect the wishes of this someone else!

If someone is more generous than GPL etc. would imply, it is
their choice. They own the rights. And I think we are not to
discuss their generosity, or accuse them of the lack thereof,
if so perceived by us!