From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b076e6315fd62dc5
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.219.66 with SMTP id pm2mr3159047pbc.8.1336724406453;
        Fri, 11 May 2012 01:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni12973pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news-peer.in.tum.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:20:05 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: fyi, very interesting Ada paper OOP vs. Readability
References: <jodq5f$j5f$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jof9dq$c46$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1fcezxog7qwud.tc9mrhco9t1c$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fabcf68$0$9505$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <jogkdf$3tf$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4fabe79e$0$9518$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <4FAC0BBC.9050409@tidorum.invalid>
In-Reply-To: <4FAC0BBC.9050409@tidorum.invalid>
Message-ID: <4faccbb5$0$9520$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 May 2012 10:20:05 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 36d0d30e.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=8N=5KF<O:jN2:OR3:3gaE@ic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRAnkgeX?EC@@@hXZIWVe1=PLPCY\c7>ejVHN;U[7o0bU0GKk\97Mb=13D
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-05-11T10:20:05+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 10.05.12 20:41, Niklas Holsti wrote:

>> ADD a b c TO d e f GIVING g h i
>>
>> I find this one-liner highly readable, too.
>
> And how do you read it? I don't remember such an ADD format, with more than one identifier between "to" and "giving", and it does not appear in the OpenCOBOL Programmer's Guide at

Somehow I was convinced the above was possible.
Not so, should have checked again. And then,
the ADD formats, while possibly assigning multiple
identifiers and adding multiple operands, do not
do what the above statement would have implied,
sorry. This is all not so clear, after all.