From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.182.214.72 with SMTP id ny8mr9663521obc.18.1421353458879; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:24:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.219.13 with SMTP id pk13mr16683obc.39.1421353458778; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:24:18 -0800 (PST) Path: border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!h15no5988576igd.0!news-out.google.com!qk8ni6628igc.0!nntp.google.com!h15no5988569igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:24:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2602:306:3784:5b10:5d9f:dbc9:1a2f:e1c; posting-account=yiWntAoAAAC1KqC_shmxJYv07B9l6LNU NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:3784:5b10:5d9f:dbc9:1a2f:e1c References: <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87bnmd8mg2.fsf@ixod.org> <19cf9bc2-f8b9-4735-b427-7b070dda59da@googlegroups.com> <1otenmcbgnvlt$.dn9361nl2jm8$.dlg@40tude.net> <8ryfky4awox2$.q2gfw4pvsgau.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4fa70dea-46b0-48ec-8ea3-fafee91a5739@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware From: David Botton Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:24:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191886 Date: 2015-01-15T12:24:18-08:00 List-Id: > Meanwhile, in the world of single-vendor languages, Microsoft > is releasing program analysis tools based on its compiler > infrastructure, using Apache 2.0 licensing: >=20 > https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn Amazing how traditional closed source vendors are becoming the heros of ope= n source while the open source vendors are busy trying to use old world fai= led closed source lock in techniques like shareware... I'm busy writing gnoga_doc (and the background library for the coming Gnoga= IDE it is using) reinventing the wheel (again) because of open source lice= nse abuses... It would have been better for me to use ASIS, but since ASIS = versions and compiler versions need to match and are not distributed as one= package to the FSF everyone loses, again. The entire goal of open source was to share knowledge, grow from each other= and make sure your tools of the trade are not stolen away by some corporat= e interests, etc. I can't say that the idea has failed but I can't say ther= e is complete success either. David Botton