From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.232.42 with SMTP id tl10mr8515135pbc.7.1335514172000;
        Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni103671pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:09:31 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <9af5eaaa-1c48-4455-a8e8-39dd9ee8092d@ot8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <op.wdcj0snyule2fv@douda-yannick> <jnada9$1dv$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <3324774.1793.1335453581565.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncc41>
 <21303184.864.1335494280519.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbgg10>
In-Reply-To: 
 <21303184.864.1335494280519.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbgg10>
Message-ID: <4f9a543a$0$6563$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Apr 2012 10:09:30 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: b111d9dc.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=fZbi\UAbeLX@>[RYkFXOIP4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[:5mIKIh2\o[PCY\c7>ejVXBa<hKnH5bMX:1aOK>M6oL[
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-04-27T10:09:30+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 27.04.12 04:38, ytomino wrote:

> And, some languages such as C# has tackled the problem that a base-class is changed independently of derived-classes.

Implying, maybe, that inheritance of classes may not be the
best way to write reusable modules?