From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.156.199 with SMTP id y7mr478276bkw.7.1335387035754;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 h15ni165309bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:50:34 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <jn9hp2$2qv$1@dont-email.me>
In-Reply-To: <jn9hp2$2qv$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <4f98639a$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2012 22:50:34 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6ac48494.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=E90=@^6M<_TAX0F2i><W:S4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[hn@@Y2U:<l^PCY\c7>ejVXmH1IV7EQHS\=AX[aLYgmQU
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-04-25T22:50:34+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 25.04.12 21:02, Oliver Kleinke wrote:

> partial classes are totally different from subunits.

Well, partially different from subunits, at least from a less
technical point of view on structuring source ;-)


>>> 2) parallel loops / functions
>> Array support in the direction of utilizing parallel
>> micro-micro-processing powers.
>
> Already present in GNAT, implicitly though.

Where, please? I'm very curious, since what we have found to be working is
either tied to GCC's type attributes, or seems to be caused by the compiler
working in miraculous ways: small arrays/sequences of floats can be,
or may be, made operands of SIMD instructions on Intel compatible
hardware. Tricky, and hard to control, yet worth a factor 2.