From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.197.193 with SMTP id iw1mr2766535pbc.0.1335360952642;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni97006pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!feeder1-1.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:35:27 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <4f97bf40$0$6559$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <24059627.96.1335359487863.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbfx1>
In-Reply-To: <24059627.96.1335359487863.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbfx1>
Message-ID: <4f97fd9f$0$7616$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2012 15:35:27 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8aa2ca72.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=nZ>TL9]gj3ng`45cDR8l?oic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa<`=YMgDjhgblY\DnWb[:Ebnc\616M64>jLh>_cHTX3jmW>]QSW\lL>i
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-04-25T15:35:27+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 25.04.12 15:11, Marc C wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:09:22 AM UTC-5, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>> On 25.04.12 09:47, Martin wrote:
>>> Ok, we don't officially have Ada2012 yet but as no new features are going to be added to it, now seems like a good time to start thinking about the next revision.
>>>
> 
>> My favorite change would start here:
>>
>> 0) Which features do you think can be dropped from Ada?
> 
> - Stubs, i.e. "is separate".

Particularly interesting, since now Microsoft is popularizing
partial classes.