From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e92d558e5b77fce2
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.226.10 with SMTP id ro10mr13694493pbc.6.1328612282513;
        Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni270195pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:58:01 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Building limited types through nested creator functions
References: 
 <40048c5a-ecf5-43e6-8c76-a294d0c333d1@l14g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <45c75d2a-02b4-40b2-b69b-04c6bf7a47a5@t2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <f7678d6e-6746-485f-a148-4f0821ffe9ed@e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
 <57a267ec-b901-401e-b415-ca6d9cf47616@d15g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
 <326bcb0a-e37d-4d67-84c2-3d21e3ba3ffe@h6g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <12ltgmjr08pwh.10sal6ffvej77.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <12ltgmjr08pwh.10sal6ffvej77.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <4f3103b9$0$6560$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Feb 2012 11:58:02 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 890371d8.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=LjaMKG8[0j_YQ5E:l<XC@S4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[el:i0:NH2ZVnc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j][9Ga<JQdn=T
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-02-07T11:58:02+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 07.02.12 10:10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> The problem is that constructing functions of Ada are no replacement to
> constructors, especially not with limited types.

Won't constructors have the same issue with limited private types
and no copying?