From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf2571446148ae30
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.190.99 with SMTP id gp3mr16187818pbc.1.1325713152377;
        Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni127930pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:36:49 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.25) Gecko/20111213 Thunderbird/3.1.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Can't set executable stack size during compilation
References: <ce6c46af-03e5-43bf-aa62-e7415061cf64@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
 <4f047e0f$0$6582$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <CB2A3B6A.DD62%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CB2A3B6A.DD62%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4f04c66c$0$6625$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Jan 2012 22:36:44 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9630ead8.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=BCZ@>d]4nW1^cW`WBF>WQ<A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;@:>SDEfdW76PCY\c7>ejV8>nKe26<7?U8j4K8gga:^k:
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-01-04T22:36:44+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 1/4/12 6:22 PM, Bill Findlay wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 16:27, in article
> 4f047e0f$0$6582$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net, "Georg Bauhaus"
> <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>  wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I made a little test program; I think it is legal
>
> It's not legal, of course: it fetches unassigned variables,

I had though that variables not assigned (uninitialized?)
won't be the subject of legality rules (and would otherwise
have to be rejected during compilation or post-compilation)?

If the program did perform I/O, its executions is likely
to have error, yes.