From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d778a4f52acd9d43
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.75.170 with SMTP id d10mr8260473pbw.6.1324566586874;
        Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:09:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni51991pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:09:45 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Representation clauses for base-64 encoding
References: <slrnjf5uol.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <4ef31672$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <9lgls6FticU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <9lgls6FticU1@mid.individual.net>
Message-ID: <4ef34839$0$7623$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Dec 2011 16:09:45 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: f4acbe21.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=?O8UHL?G57H@Y=h<_c3PkHic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRA<`=YMgDjhgBTT2:ZAgWN2APCY\c7>ejVHF35^f:j1liDbe]GV@Va[<B
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-12-22T16:09:45+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 22.12.11 13:24, Niklas Holsti wrote:

> This defines a nice Ada representation of the six-bit codes. But this was not Natasha's question;

You are quite right, sorry.

Stubbornly, I'd like to mumble, though, that the very
notion of representation is at odds with portability.