From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,68536605ede13a20
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.75.170 with SMTP id d10mr4673709pbw.6.1324465537026;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:05:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni47637pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:05:07 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT - return by anonymous access
References: 
 <784c67eb-a542-41b0-b23d-fca1234e56b2@n10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
 <jcoidj$lpr$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <b896b012-1f49-494c-a585-3d37a7c0965a@q9g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <jcr551$2jq$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <95f3b0fc-af24-4ace-afc9-227e8893ea99@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
 <91845790-2447-4b2c-a6b5-1a52557c8c17@d10g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <91845790-2447-4b2c-a6b5-1a52557c8c17@d10g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <4ef1bd63$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Dec 2011 12:05:07 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5e83fc3c.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=e=hFidTa[Ia]l@YUW5NBkn4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkNc<S4EZ9<8nPCY\c7>ejVhLTFfGUoDj\fFTN3g>4WIUi
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-12-21T12:05:07+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 21.12.11 08:29, AdaMagica wrote:
> On 21 Dez., 01:44, Simon Belmont<sbelmont...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> It is my understanding that Ada05 has done away with 'return-by-
>> reference' in favor of 'return-by-anonymous-access', which would lead
>> me to believe that you would *have* to use them if you want to return
>> an allocated limited type.
>
> Hm, no, return-by-reference has been replaced by build-in-place.

GNAT recommends to use a pointer, though, in one of its
error messages. Perhaps this should be changed so that
it suggests a construct like

   X := new Limited_Type'(Build_in_Place_Function);

?