From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0b40cfe80587a8d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.43.48.202 with SMTP id ux10mr11023292icb.6.1320322312964;
        Thu, 03 Nov 2011 05:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p6ni66320pbn.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:11:51 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: task discriminants and invariant expressions in SPARK
References: <4eae96be$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <c3cd5d68-4112-43db-9541-dd6434985b87@l19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <c3cd5d68-4112-43db-9541-dd6434985b87@l19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <4eb28508$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Nov 2011 13:11:52 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: bfc3a15c.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=<c\d2HnR=K0RLigj];iP=84IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;5LCKWkH=]U?nc\616M64>:Lh>_cHTX3j=P;>6I2k:j0>
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18802
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-11-03T13:11:52+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 03.11.11 10:34, Phil Thornley wrote:

> I can't find anything relevant in the documentation - there's no list
> of known deficiences in the GPL release note.
> 
> It is probably worth reporting this even if you are not a supported
> customer - use spark@adacore.com as the address (and include "SPARK"
> in the subject line otherwise it gets dumped in the spam bucket).

Thanks for having a look. A report is now sent.

I have also tried a variation that uses a protected object
in place of an atomic object. Same diagnostic message.