From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:270f:: with SMTP id g15mr5086148qtg.18.1547164478902;
        Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:54:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7310:: with SMTP id e16mr90362otk.7.1547164478733;
 Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v55no339437qtk.0!news-out.google.com!m21ni146qta.0!nntp.google.com!v55no339429qtk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:54:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1ae2b744-f80b-4450-b8d3-7b49fca01f15@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <4s8rud$9j3@tribune>#1/1>
 <1ae2b744-f80b-4450-b8d3-7b49fca01f15@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4ea8791d-9bec-4371-b654-30cdd556a8da@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Why couldn't an operating system be written in ada
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:54:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55261
Date: 2019-01-10T15:54:38-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, 10 January 2019 23:38:22 UTC, cenc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> Em s=C3=A1bado, 13 de julho de 1996 04:00:00 UTC-3, Mark  McKinney  escre=
veu:
> > It has been claimed that the capability to interface with other languag=
es=20
> > is a great asset to ada. Sometimes interfacing can be a tremendous=20
> > liability. Besides the OS could perform most of work that the language=
=20
> > runtime does. So why not build an OS in ADA?
>=20
> Is this discussion still active ?

Given, this was from 1996, I'd say not. Just start a new thread if you want=
 to ask/know something.