From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e36020a4e7d24836
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Cyrille <comar@eu.adacore.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to leave .ali files in original library?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <4e951740-bf7a-46e3-b16e-309c5f26310d@a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
References: <slrninfg27.kmk.localhost@example.org>
 <87zkp4uhjl.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <slrningqqj.27q.localhost@example.org> <m2mxl3v5vf.fsf@pushface.org>
 <slrningsuj.27q.localhost@example.org>
 <eebf3b04-6c56-4192-a0e9-958ac126e428@l2g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <ilbfgo$hto$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <f2613bb8-b6cc-48c4-a60e-64797ae6a6a8@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <4xjep.165303$qA1.60752@newsfe08.ams2>
 <dd9668fb-6ef7-4666-b498-139594b64655@v16g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.98.77.125
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299838181 31395 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2011 10:09:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=194.98.77.125;
 posting-account=bNhsVwoAAAB6XmNPWgYcbUm6npIwL2C4
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.14)
 Gecko/20110218 Firefox/3.6.14 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18082
Date: 2011-03-11T02:09:40-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 11, 10:26=A0am, Cyrille <co...@eu.adacore.com> wrote:

> gprbuild has indeed been designed to be as compiler independent as
> possible. Although, to be fair, we have put more effort into
> addressing the variability of C/C++ compilers than for the Ada
> compiler and on the Ada side, GNATitudes m

I hit the "send button" a bit fast. I was about to say that on the Ada
side, there might be a few GNATitudes but that can always be
corrected. If other Ada vendors want to adapt gprbuild to their
technology, it should be possible since gprbuild is open source. We
will be happy to review and incorporate patches to that effect!