From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a875d9649dde34e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-11!sn-xit-08!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "AndreS" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GWindows and a future home for it Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:58:14 -0400 Organization: www.talkaboutprogramming.com Message-ID: <4e8fe302b927b504b93983dba6b0d79f@localhost.talkaboutprogramming.com> X-Newsreader: www.talkaboutprogramming.com Content-Type: text/plain; References: X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4517 Date: 2004-10-01T12:58:14-04:00 List-Id: I have been doing a lot of testing with the early releases of GWindows. The reason why I started with GWindows was the way CLAW is designed. GWindows is much closer to the WIndows API. Another advantage of GWindows is that is GNU and not commercial like CLAW. So my vote is for GWindows. When David Botton gives up the support of GWindows, I will volunteer to be one of the engineers in the team to solve problems and implement extentions (I am already using some extentions in my own private version of GWindows). The best way to create a community on GWindows is probably SourgeForce. I think I can overcome the CVS problem. By the way, did somebody already try to contact David Botton on this issue? If anyone likes to join me to continue the development of GWindows, please send an e-mail.